Monday, March 27, 2017

Week 11

Part A: Strain Gauges:
Strain gauges are used to measure the strain or stress levels on the materials. Alternatively, pressure on the strain gauge causes a generated voltage and it can be used as an energy harvester. You will be given either the flapping or tapping type gauge. When you test the circle buzzer type gauge, you will lay it flat on the table and tap on it. If it is the long rectangle one, you will flap the piece to generate voltage.

1. Connect the oscilloscope probes to the strain gauge. Record the peak voltage values (positive and negative) by flipping/tapping the gauge with low and high pressure. Make sure to set the oscilloscope horizontal and vertical scales appropriately so you can read the values. DO NOT USE the measure tool of the oscilloscope. Adjust your oscilloscope so you can read the values from the screen. Fill out Table 1 and provide photos of the oscilloscope.

Table 1: Strain gauge characteristics
Flipping Strength
Minimum Voltage
Maximum Voltage
Low
.6 V pk-pk
1.4 V pk-pk
High
1.32 V pk-pk
3.54V Pk-pk

Table 2: Buzzer gauge characteristics
TappingStrength
Minimum Voltage
Maximum Voltage
Low
2.4 V
2.8 V
High
5 V
6.2 V


Flipping test with high strength Max value 

Flipping test with low strength Max Value

Flipping test with high strength lowest value

Flipping test low strength low value

Tapping test low strength, low value

Tapping test low strength, high value

Tapping test high strength, low value

Tapping test high strength, high value


Part B: Half-Wave Rectifiers

1. Construct the following half-wave rectifier. Measure the input and the output using the oscilloscope and provide a snapshot of the outputs.


Schematic of the Half Wave rectifer





2. Calculate the effective voltage of the input and output and compare the values with the measured ones by completing the following table.

Table 3: Showing the RMS values calculated and measured
RMS Values
Calculated
Measured
Input
3.53 V 
3.6 V 
Output
3.53 V 
2.07 V 

3. Explain how you calculated the rms values. Do calculated and measured values match?

To measure the RMS value you take the appropriate voltage, in this case 10 V. Then you divide it by square root 2.
4. Construct the following circuit and record the output voltage using both DMM and the oscilloscope.
Table 4: Showing the varying output voltages obtained through different measuring mediums with 1uF

Oscilloscope
DMM
Output Voltage (p-p)
5.4 V
1.47 V
Output Voltage (mean)
5.5 V
5.77 V

5. Replace the 1 µF capacitor with 100 µF and repeat the previous step. What has changed?

Table 5: Showing the varying output voltages obtained through different measuring mediums with 100uF

Oscilloscope
DMM
Output Voltage (p-p)
.16 V
.02 V
Output Voltage (mean)
6.83 V
6.75 V

Part C: Energy Harvesters

1. Construct the half-wave rectifier circuit without the resistor but with the 1 µF capacitor. Instead of the function generator, use the strain gauge. Discharge the capacitor every time you start a new measurement. Flip/tap your strain gauge and observe the output voltage. Fill out the table below:

Table 6:
Tap Frequency
Duration
Output Voltages
1 flip/second
10 Seconds
 .26 V
1 flip/second
20 Seconds
 .43 V
1 flip/second
30 Seconds
 .4 V
4 flips/second
10 Seconds
 .44 V
4 flips/second
20 Seconds
 .506 V
4 flips/second
30 Seconds
 .514 V

2. Briefly explain your results.

The longer we flipped the stress the gauge the more the capacitor was being charged. Therefore, the DMM was reading higher values. The same is also true for when we flipped it 4 times a second. The flips generate a voltage, and the capacitor stores the voltage, while simultaneously draining. The more frequent the flips for a longer duration will produce an overall higher voltage.

3. If we do not use the diode in the circuit (i.e. using only strain gauge to charge the capacitor), what would you observe at the output? Why?

The output would be smaller because there isn’t a big rush of electricity flowing through the circuit. The diode we used in the circuit was meant to mimic a half-wave rectifier. We see that when we view our sin waves because there is no negative part this is because of the diode. When the diode is taken out there will have negative values since there is no half-wave rectifier being applied to the circuit.

4. Write a MATLAB code to plot the date in table of Part C1.

*Code we used to get the Half-Wave Rectifier Graph*

x=[10 10 20 20 30 30];
y=[.26 .44 .43 .506 .4 .514];
plot(x,y)
xlabel('Time (seconds)');
ylabel('Vout (V)');

grid on

Half-Wave Rectifier Graph



The graph of the half-wave rectifier using MATLAB.


*Code we used to get the Half-Wave Rectifier Graph*

x=[10,20,30];
Va=[0.26,.43,.62];
Vb=[.44,.506,.514];
plot(x,Va,'--k')
hold on
plot(x,Vb)
legend('1 flip/second','4 flip/second')
xlabel('Time (s)')
ylabel('Output Voltage (V)')
title('Half-Wave Recitifier')

Half-Wave Rectifier Graph

This is the graph of both of the Output Voltages, but they are separated.






5 comments:

  1. For part a Number 2 your output rms values calculated and measured were also off from each other so it makes me feel better that ours were too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It makes me feel better that we aren't the only group with that difference as well!

      Delete
  2. I am confused about the format of your final MatLab Graph. It seems there is only one plot of data, and it looks like within your editor text that you placed multiple of values for you time values. Might I suggest placing the two separate plots of measurements of time and holding each plot so that they will both appear on the image, and that your image may make sense.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your input Nick I'll make sure to change that now. I thought it was right because it showcases that this is a half-wave rectifier, but I think your right in that we should have 2 separate lines.

      Delete
  3. For part B, your half-wave rectifier showed much more accurately on the oscilloscope than our own, we were not able to get a perfect cut off. Your results from part A also seemed more consistent than our own. Also, nicely done tables for your data.

    ReplyDelete